Skip to main content
case studies

Elliott Wave in Action

Real analysis examples with verified outcomes. We include both winning and losing trades because transparency builds trust.

EUR/USDDailyFebruary 2026

Wave 3 Extension to 161.8% — Textbook Impulse

HIT

Movement

+530 pips

R:R

2.3:1

Duration

18 trading days

Setup

After a clear Wave 2 retracement to the 61.8% Fibonacci level (1.0450), our daily analysis identified the start of Wave 3. The invalidation was set below Wave 1 origin at 1.0220.

Outcome

Wave 3 extended exactly to the 161.8% Fibonacci extension at 1.0980 — a 530-pip move. The initial risk was 230 pips with a stop below Wave 1, giving a 2.3:1 reward-to-risk ratio.

Key Lesson

Wave 3 extensions to 161.8% are the most reliable pattern in Elliott Wave. When Wave 2 retraces to 61.8% and holds, the probability of a Wave 3 extension is significantly higher.

XAU/USD (Gold)H4 + DailyJanuary 2026

Triangle in Wave 4 — Breakout to Wave 5

HIT

Movement

+420 pips

R:R

3.8:1

Duration

7 trading days

Setup

Gold formed a contracting triangle (A-B-C-D-E) in the Wave 4 position on the daily chart. The H4 chart confirmed the E wave completion with a bullish reversal candle. Target: 100% equality of Wave 1 measured from Wave 4 end.

Outcome

The breakout from the triangle led to a clean Wave 5 rally. Price reached our target zone within one week. The tight triangle structure provided a very small stop loss, resulting in an excellent risk-reward.

Key Lesson

Triangles in Wave 4 are one of the most tradeable patterns because the E wave provides a precise entry point with a small stop loss. Wave 5 after a triangle is typically swift but shorter than Wave 3.

GBP/USDDailyMarch 2026

Failed Wave 5 — Early Invalidation Signal

INVALIDATED

Movement

-85 pips

R:R

-1:1

Duration

3 trading days

Setup

Our analysis projected a Wave 5 extension in GBP/USD. However, the wave structure showed overlapping price action and declining momentum — classic signs of a potential truncation or count error.

Outcome

Wave 5 failed to exceed Wave 3 high (truncation) and reversed sharply. Our invalidation level was hit 3 days after publication. The analysis was marked as INVALIDATED on our scorecard.

Key Lesson

Not every analysis works. This case demonstrates why invalidation levels are critical. When Wave 5 shows overlapping subwaves and declining RSI divergence, reduce position size or wait for confirmation.

US100 (Nasdaq)Weekly + DailyDecember 2025

Macro Wave Count — Identifying the Larger Cycle

HIT

Movement

+1600 pips

R:R

2.1:1

Duration

34 trading days

Setup

Our weekly analysis showed US100 completing a larger degree Wave 3 at 18,500. We projected a Wave 4 correction to the 38.2% retracement level near 16,800. The daily chart confirmed the start of a three-wave corrective structure (A-B-C).

Outcome

The correction played out almost exactly as projected. Wave A dropped sharply, Wave B retraced 61.8% of A (a flat correction), and Wave C reached our target zone between 16,700-16,900. We then published a bullish reversal setup for Wave 5.

Key Lesson

Multi-timeframe analysis is essential. The weekly chart provides the macro context, and the daily chart reveals the corrective structure. Without the weekly perspective, the correction could have been mistaken for a new downtrend.

Access All Analysis

Subscribers see every analysis with full charts, wave counts, and real-time outcome tracking on the interactive scorecard.

Chat with EWS Helix